Abstract
This essay was inspired by the growing critical and artistic attention currently afforded to the subject of the nonhuman animal within Posthumanism and a curiosity to explore photographic practices that could potentially contribute to this endeavour. An exploration of Postmodernist art practice has revealed a dramatic shift in approach to the nonhuman animal subject; essentially characterised as a move from a sceptical, emotionally-distanced, theoretically-grounded range of practices to those that are emotionally-engaged, affective and ethically responsive. This is not to suggest that this characterises all Posthumanist photographic practices; a number of critical writers ably theorise about global networks, nonhuman photography, abstraction of vision. Instead, I examine photographic practices which are embedded within compassion, generosity, responsibility. This is not a return to the modernist notion of the artist and his or hers creation, but a plea for productive interrelations based on equality and experimentation which will potentially lead to novel ways of living.
References
Aleci, L. K. 1998. “Images of Identity: Italian Portrait Collections of the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries.” In: The Image of the Individual: Portraits in the Renaissance, edited by Nicholas Mann and Luke Syson. London: British Museum Press.
Baetens, J. 2007. Critical Realism in Contemporary Art: Around Allan Sekula’s Photography. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Baker, S. 2000. The Postmodern Animal (Essays in Art and Culture). Kindle ed. London: Reaktion Books.
———. 1993. Picturing the Beast. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.00013_10.x
Barthes, R. 1997. “The Death of the Author.” In: Image, Music, Text, 142–148. New York: Hill & Wang.
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Berger, J. 1977. Why Look at Animals? In About Looking. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
Bezan, S. and Tink, J., eds. 2017. Seeing Animals after Derrida. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Bjerregaard, P., Rasmussen, A. E. and Sorensen, T. F., eds. 2016. Materialities of Passing: Explorations in Transformation, Transition and Transience. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315594309
Burt, J. 2005. “John Berger’s ‘Why Look at Animals?’ A Close Reading.” Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, (9)2: 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568535054615321
Coole, D. and Frost, S. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Crowther, P. 2018. Geneses of Postmodern Art: Technology as Iconology (Routledge Advances in Art and Visual Studies). Kindle ed. Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467974-3
Cunniff G. E., 2011. “Responsive Becoming: Ethics between Deleuze and Feminism.” In: Deleuze and Ethics, edited by Nathan Jun and Daniel Smith. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748641178.003.0005
Daston, L. and Mitman, G., eds. 2006. Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism. Kindle ed. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/504573
Derrida, J. 2011. The Beast and the Sovereign, Volume 1 (The Seminars of Jacques Derrida). Kindle ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.
Grant, J. and Jungkunz, V. G., eds. 2016. Political Theory and the Animal/Human Relationship. New York: SUNY Press.
Haraway, D. J. 2007. The Companion Species Manifesto. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Krauss, R. 1986. “The Originality of the Avant Garde.” In: The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/776815
Kuspit, D. 1991. “Tart Wit, Wise Humor.” Art Forum 29(1): 93–101.
Little, D. E. n.d. “Simen Johan’s Kingdom, The Beautiful Perfection of Unfulfilled Symbolism.” Amherst: Mead Art Museum. Accessed April 20. https://www.simenjohan.com/texts/index.html.
Manning, E. 2015. “Artfulness.” In: The Nonhuman Turn, edited by Richard Grusin, 45–79. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Peterson, D. and Goodall, J. 2000. Visions of Caliban: On Chimpanzees and People. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Royle, N. 2003. The Uncanny. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Said, E. 2003. Orientalism. London: Penguin.
Sibley, D. 1995. Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
Thomas, K. 1991. Man and the Natural World (Penguin Press History). Kindle ed. 760–761. London: Penguin Books.
Van Alphen, E. 1997. “The Portrait’s Dispersal: Concepts of Representation and Subjectivity in Contemporary Portraiture.” In: Portraiture: Facing the Subject, edited by Joanna Woodall. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Virilio, P. 1989. “The Last Vehicle.” In: Speed – Visions of the Accelerated Age, edited by Jeremy Millar and Michiel Schwarz, 1998. London: Whitechapel Art Gallery.
Weil, K. 2012. Thinking Animals: Why Animal Studies Now? New York: Columbia University Press.
Wells, L., ed. 2018. Layers of Visibility. Exhibition catalogue. Plymouth: University of Plymouth Press.
Wells, L. n.d. “Carceri.” Accessed April 20. http://martinpoverphotography.blogspot.com
Woodall, J. 1997. “Sovereign Bodies: The Reality of Status in Seventeenth Century Dutch Portraiture”. In: Portraiture: Facing the Subject, edited by Joanna Woodall. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
© Membrana Institute and the author(s). All rights reserved.