You must be a subscriber to view the main content of this page. Please subscribe to an option that fits your needs and get access to core content! If you are already a subscriber just sign in below. If you have purchased a subscription via Offline payment, the content will be unlocked upon receiving your payment.
Perceiving Chameleons
Doi: https://doi.org/10.47659/m1.066.art
- Vol. 1, no. 1
- 2016
- April 4, 2020
For centuries, military uniforms had been colourful to differentiate friend from foe on the battlefield, but also as a distinguishing feature towards civil society. With technological progress and the advent of both aviation and improved photography a century ago, camouflage became a necessity. Artists and zoologists played a huge role in developing camouflage patterns. Today, most nations have a distinct national camouflage, and often, specific services or special forces have their very own uniforms as a sign of distinction. Nevertheless, many patterns can be traced back to the 1930s and 1940s. While fooling an observer is at the heart of military camouflage, it remains to be ambivalent, with its roles ranging from a desired cloak of invisibility to an indicator of power and prowess. In the past decades, camouflage has become synonymous with the military, and simultaneously, a global icon on its own, a political statement and an aspect of fashion.
- Keywords: camouflage, cloak of invisibility, fashion, military
Martin Bayer (born 1971) works in the fields of civic education and the cultural dimension of war. He has a vocational education in photography from Lette Verein Berlin, a BA in War Studies from King’s College London and a Master of Peace and Security Policy Studies from the Institute of Peace and Security Policy Studies at the University of Hamburg. One of his main subjects is the First World War about which he also wrote the centenary study for the German Foreign Office. His project Wartist (www.wartist.org) includes a bilingual blog website on war and the arts and curating various art exhibitions. His own photographic projects comprise series on disused military equipment and data on sunken warships. He lives and works in Berlin, Germany.
Buy PDF – 6,00 EURYou can check our other subscription options.
Abstract
Author
Artists
PDF
Close
For centuries, military uniforms had been colourful to differentiate friend from foe on the battlefield, but also as a distinguishing feature towards civil society. With technological progress and the advent of both aviation and improved photography a century ago, camouflage became a necessity. Artists and zoologists played a huge role in developing camouflage patterns. Today, most nations have a distinct national camouflage, and often, specific services or special forces have their very own uniforms as a sign of distinction. Nevertheless, many patterns can be traced back to the 1930s and 1940s. While fooling an observer is at the heart of military camouflage, it remains to be ambivalent, with its roles ranging from a desired cloak of invisibility to an indicator of power and prowess. In the past decades, camouflage has become synonymous with the military, and simultaneously, a global icon on its own, a political statement and an aspect of fashion.
- Keywords: camouflage, cloak of invisibility, fashion, military
Martin Bayer (born 1971) works in the fields of civic education and the cultural dimension of war. He has a vocational education in photography from Lette Verein Berlin, a BA in War Studies from King’s College London and a Master of Peace and Security Policy Studies from the Institute of Peace and Security Policy Studies at the University of Hamburg. One of his main subjects is the First World War about which he also wrote the centenary study for the German Foreign Office. His project Wartist (www.wartist.org) includes a bilingual blog website on war and the arts and curating various art exhibitions. His own photographic projects comprise series on disused military equipment and data on sunken warships. He lives and works in Berlin, Germany.
Buy PDF – 6,00 EURYou can check our other subscription options.
Abstract
Author
Artists
PDF
Close
For centuries, military uniforms had been colourful to differentiate friend from foe on the battlefield, but also as a distinguishing feature towards civil society. With technological progress and the advent of both aviation and improved photography a century ago, camouflage became a necessity. Artists and zoologists played a huge role in developing camouflage patterns. Today, most nations have a distinct national camouflage, and often, specific services or special forces have their very own uniforms as a sign of distinction. Nevertheless, many patterns can be traced back to the 1930s and 1940s. While fooling an observer is at the heart of military camouflage, it remains to be ambivalent, with its roles ranging from a desired cloak of invisibility to an indicator of power and prowess. In the past decades, camouflage has become synonymous with the military, and simultaneously, a global icon on its own, a political statement and an aspect of fashion.
- Keywords: camouflage, cloak of invisibility, fashion, military
Martin Bayer (born 1971) works in the fields of civic education and the cultural dimension of war. He has a vocational education in photography from Lette Verein Berlin, a BA in War Studies from King’s College London and a Master of Peace and Security Policy Studies from the Institute of Peace and Security Policy Studies at the University of Hamburg. One of his main subjects is the First World War about which he also wrote the centenary study for the German Foreign Office. His project Wartist (www.wartist.org) includes a bilingual blog website on war and the arts and curating various art exhibitions. His own photographic projects comprise series on disused military equipment and data on sunken warships. He lives and works in Berlin, Germany.
Buy PDF – 6,00 EURYou can check our other subscription options.
- Cover photo: Simon Menner: Camouflage.
Disruptive pattern camouflage has become synonymous for military kit. Besides its military use, it is also an icon of its own, a symbol of protest as well as an aspect of fashion.
Reading Time: 8 minutes
Reading Time: 8 minutes
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
- Cover photo: Simon Menner: Camouflage.
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Similar subject
- By subject: concealment, surveillance & control
I would be reluctant to treat the monocular gaze of the camera and camouflage as a binary opposition. /.../ If we conceptualise the relation between the two as a duality – as visibility vs. invisibility, as watching machine vs. camouflage – then we run the risk of missing the fact that they are absolutely interlocked together and part of the same economy. I don’t see camouflage as being a response to panopticism, because camouflage is already part of the panoptic system.