You must be a subscriber to view the main content of this page. Please subscribe to an option that fits your needs and get access to core content! If you are already a subscriber just sign in below. If you have purchased a subscription via Offline payment, the content will be unlocked upon receiving your payment.
Snapchat: a Brief Encounter
Doi: https://doi.org/10.47659/m2.090.art
- Vol. 2, no. 1
- 2017
- March 27, 2020
For users of the image messaging Snapchat app, expressiveness is largely mediated through in-built filters and extensive use of short pieces of text and emojis. It is also contingent upon the disappearance of the image after a set time. The certainty these images will not be retained – that they will disappear – sanctions a degree of liberty in what is sent between users. However, there is also a reciprocal level of trust, since despite the app itself having no feature to save an image, recipients can screen capture the images they receive. Users do receive notification that their image has been saved in a screen capture, and this is likely to elicit a spontaneous reaction of despair, a breach of the code of disappearing images that is implicit in Snapchat’s communication method. In this essay, I propose Snapchat portraits express not the face as image but image as perplexing, disappearing, mutating phenomena. With their filters and distortions they unsettle our notions of the index and with their built in disappearance they challenge any notion of image as a memory prosthetic. Snapchat, as a form of portraiture, is not engaged with likeness or reproducibility. Instead, it stresses duplication, disguise and disappearance as the dominant features of contemporary culture.
- Keywords: photo filters, Snapchat, Snapchat portrait
John Hillman is an educator, image-maker and writer. Based in the U.K. his interests are focused around post-photography theory – an investigation into the contemporary account of what the image is becoming. This has led to thinking through the aesthetic, philosophical and technological approaches to image making. Ultimately, his written work and his practice is an interrogation of how images operate in a contemporary culture, which is currently largely structured by the digital.
- Hand, M., 2010, The Rise and Fall of Cyberspace, or How Cyberspace Turned Inside Out. In: Hall, J. Grindstaff, L. Ming-Cheng, L., eds. Culture: A Sociological Handbook. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891377.ch34
- Rubinstein, D., & Sluis, K., 2008. A Life More Photographic. In: Photographies, 1:1, pp. 9–28.
- Žižek, S., 2011. Living in the End of Times. London: Verso.
Buy PDF – 6,00 EURYou can check our other subscription options.
Abstract
Author
References
Artists
PDF
Close
For users of the image messaging Snapchat app, expressiveness is largely mediated through in-built filters and extensive use of short pieces of text and emojis. It is also contingent upon the disappearance of the image after a set time. The certainty these images will not be retained – that they will disappear – sanctions a degree of liberty in what is sent between users. However, there is also a reciprocal level of trust, since despite the app itself having no feature to save an image, recipients can screen capture the images they receive. Users do receive notification that their image has been saved in a screen capture, and this is likely to elicit a spontaneous reaction of despair, a breach of the code of disappearing images that is implicit in Snapchat’s communication method. In this essay, I propose Snapchat portraits express not the face as image but image as perplexing, disappearing, mutating phenomena. With their filters and distortions they unsettle our notions of the index and with their built in disappearance they challenge any notion of image as a memory prosthetic. Snapchat, as a form of portraiture, is not engaged with likeness or reproducibility. Instead, it stresses duplication, disguise and disappearance as the dominant features of contemporary culture.
- Keywords: photo filters, Snapchat, Snapchat portrait
John Hillman is an educator, image-maker and writer. Based in the U.K. his interests are focused around post-photography theory – an investigation into the contemporary account of what the image is becoming. This has led to thinking through the aesthetic, philosophical and technological approaches to image making. Ultimately, his written work and his practice is an interrogation of how images operate in a contemporary culture, which is currently largely structured by the digital.
- Hand, M., 2010, The Rise and Fall of Cyberspace, or How Cyberspace Turned Inside Out. In: Hall, J. Grindstaff, L. Ming-Cheng, L., eds. Culture: A Sociological Handbook. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891377.ch34
- Rubinstein, D., & Sluis, K., 2008. A Life More Photographic. In: Photographies, 1:1, pp. 9–28.
- Žižek, S., 2011. Living in the End of Times. London: Verso.
Buy PDF – 6,00 EURYou can check our other subscription options.
Abstract
Author
References
Artists
PDF
Close
For users of the image messaging Snapchat app, expressiveness is largely mediated through in-built filters and extensive use of short pieces of text and emojis. It is also contingent upon the disappearance of the image after a set time. The certainty these images will not be retained – that they will disappear – sanctions a degree of liberty in what is sent between users. However, there is also a reciprocal level of trust, since despite the app itself having no feature to save an image, recipients can screen capture the images they receive. Users do receive notification that their image has been saved in a screen capture, and this is likely to elicit a spontaneous reaction of despair, a breach of the code of disappearing images that is implicit in Snapchat’s communication method. In this essay, I propose Snapchat portraits express not the face as image but image as perplexing, disappearing, mutating phenomena. With their filters and distortions they unsettle our notions of the index and with their built in disappearance they challenge any notion of image as a memory prosthetic. Snapchat, as a form of portraiture, is not engaged with likeness or reproducibility. Instead, it stresses duplication, disguise and disappearance as the dominant features of contemporary culture.
- Keywords: photo filters, Snapchat, Snapchat portrait
John Hillman is an educator, image-maker and writer. Based in the U.K. his interests are focused around post-photography theory – an investigation into the contemporary account of what the image is becoming. This has led to thinking through the aesthetic, philosophical and technological approaches to image making. Ultimately, his written work and his practice is an interrogation of how images operate in a contemporary culture, which is currently largely structured by the digital.
- Hand, M., 2010, The Rise and Fall of Cyberspace, or How Cyberspace Turned Inside Out. In: Hall, J. Grindstaff, L. Ming-Cheng, L., eds. Culture: A Sociological Handbook. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891377.ch34
- Rubinstein, D., & Sluis, K., 2008. A Life More Photographic. In: Photographies, 1:1, pp. 9–28.
- Žižek, S., 2011. Living in the End of Times. London: Verso.
Buy PDF – 6,00 EURYou can check our other subscription options.
- Cover photo: John Hillman: Snapchat - a Brief Encounter, 2016.
Historically, snapshots have always been about the everyday, the banal, the repetitive, the cliched events that are part of everyone’s lives. And by using Snapchat, almost any everyday activity can be combined with the production and distribution of an everyday image.
Reading Time: 11 minutes
Reading Time: 11 minutes
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
- Cover photo: John Hillman: Snapchat - a Brief Encounter, 2016.
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Similar subject
- By subject: augmented reality, physiognomy, social media
Facial recognition technology, which seeks to identify the shape of the skull beneath the skin and tissue of the face, is based on the assumption that it can be anything that occurs on the surface of the face, a potential camouflage, while the bone structure underneath it is impossible or at least very difficult to transform.