The Master as a Transnational Figure
PDF

Keywords

diplomatic visit
Nehru
photography album
Soviet Union

How to Cite

Desai, Krupa. 2020. “The Master As a Transnational Figure: Jawaharlal Nehru in The Soviet Union”. Membrana – Journal of Photography, Theory and Visual Culture 5 (2):78–87. https://doi.org/10.47659/m9.078.art.

Abstract

India’s Independence from the colonial rule saw the nation’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru emerge as a powerful visual presence. At the peak of his popularity, in June 1955, he made a highly publicised 16-day visit to the USSR. This visit, made in the backdrop of the Cold War and the impending Big Four Conference, was covered in detail by the Indian and foreign press, as well as both government’s official photographers and camerapersons. Paper addresses an official album made after this iconic visit to investigate the role of photography within India-Soviet diplomatic networks. Casting Nehru as the Master persona, it delves into the function of photography in recasting his image as an international traveller, a crusader for peace, a negotiator, and a friend of the Soviet. Considering India’s and Soviet’s differing political stance and international position in that period, the article questions what does the presence of these official photographs reveal about emerging trans-national networks and if there were there any deviations in this careful reconstruction of the Master and his ally.

https://doi.org/10.47659/m9.078.art
PDF

References

Barnes, Robert. (1979) 2013. “Between the Blocs: India, the United Nations, and Ending the Korean War.” The Journal of Korean Studies 18 (2): 263–286. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44080505.

Deleuze, Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Translated by H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Dewan, Deepali, and Deborah S. Hutton. 2013. Raja Deen Dayal: Artist-Photographer in 19th-Century India. Alkazi Collection of Photography.

Doane, Mary Ann. 2003. “The Close-up: Scale and Detail in the Cinema.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 14 (3): 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-14-3-89

Eisenstein, Sergei. 1949. Film Form: Essays in Film Theory. Edited and translated by Jay Leyda. San Diego: Harcourt.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1998. Phenomenology of spirit. Motilal Banarsidass Publ.

Jain, Jyotindra, ed. 1998. Picture Showmen: Insights into the Narrative Tradition in Indian Art. Mumbai: Marg Publications.

Mehrotra, Santosh K. 1990. India and the Soviet Union: Trade and Technology Transfer, No. 73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Menon, Kumara Padmanabha Sivasankara. 1963. The Flying Troika. London: Oxford University Press.

Mockba (Moscow). 1955. Moscow: State Fine Arts Publishing House.

Prasad, H. Y. Sharada, A. K. Damodaran, and Sarvepalli Gopal. 2005. Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru: Second Series, Vol. 29. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund.

Reddy, Gunupati Keshava. 1955. “Moscow Gives Mr. Nehru a Touching Send-Off: VISIT WAS SOVIET UNION’S FESTIVAL OF THE YEAR.” The Times of India (1861-current), June 24. [From the ProQuest database.]

Shimazu, Naoko. 2014. “Diplomacy as Theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955.” Modern Asian Studies: 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x13000371

Singh, Sinderpal. 2011. “From Delhi to Bandung: Nehru,‘Indian-ness’ and ‘Pan-Asianness’.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 34 (1): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2011.549084

Teixeira, Mariana. 2018. “Master-Slave Dialectics (in the Colonies).” Krisis 2.

© Membrana Institute and the author(s). All rights reserved.