Visual Mediations, Affordances and Social Capital
PDF

Keywords

diaspora
experience of place
new media
photography
visual mediation

How to Cite

Prieto-Blanco, Patricia. 2018. “Visual Mediations, Affordances and Social Capital”. Membrana – Journal of Photography, Theory and Visual Culture 3 (1):76–80. https://doi.org/10.47659/m4.076.art.

Abstract

Spatial dislocation of migrants is a catalyst for early, heavy and informed media use (Ponzanesi & Leurs 2014); as well as a motif for transnational families to form families of choice (Beck-Gernsheim 1998; Weston 1997). This text reports on how Irish-Spanish families living in Ireland manage this situation. It argues that (digital) photographic exchanges give rise to mediated third places (Oldenburg, 1989), where (dis)affect and belonging are negotiated. Transnational families visually mediate their domestic spaces regularly. The double visual mediation of presence and space forms part of their everyday. This, in turn, outlines current developments in how (digital) photography is used to mediate actions and emotions. In accounting for and reflecting about how (dis)affective communities of place activate affordances of media, photography emerges as a multi-dimensional site of image production, distribution and storage, in short, as a practice that is both unique to the socio-cultural moment in which it is embedded, and general enough to be recognized as such across cultures and societies.

https://doi.org/10.47659/m4.076.art
PDF

References

Agnew, J., 2011. Space and Place. In: D. Livingstone & J. Agnew, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Geographical Knowledge. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: SAGE Publications, pp. 316–330. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201091.n24

Bachelard, G., 1958/1994. Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon.

Bourdieu, P., Sapiro, G. & McHale, B., 1991. First Lecture. Social Space and to Symbolic Space: Introduction a Japanese Reading of Distinction. Poetics Today, 12(4), pp. 627–638. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1772705

Chalfen, R., 1987. Snapshot Versions of Life. Bowling Green OH: The Popular Press.

Habuchi, I., 2005. Accelerating Reflexivity. In: M. Ito, D. Okabe, & M. Matsuda, eds. Personal, Portable, Pedestrian. Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, pp. 165–182. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5309.001.0001

Horton, D. & Wohl, R.R., 1956. Mass Communication and Para – Social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance. Particip@ations, 3(1), 2006, [online]. <http://www.participations.org/volume%203/issue%201/3_01_hortonwohl.htm> [Accessed 15 Jun. 2016].

Lanzeni, D. et al., 2014. Media Futures. Media Anthropology Network European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA) Discussions [online], pp. 1–20. <http://www.mediaanthropology.net/file/discussion_media_futures.pdf> [Accessed 16 Apr. 2015].

Lapenta, F., 2011. Locative Media and the Digital Visualisation of Space, Place and Information. Visual Studies, 26(1), pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586x.2011.548483

Lunenfeld, P., 2002. Digitale Fotografie. Das dubitative Bild * [Digital Photography: The Doubtful Image]. In: H. Wolf, ed. Paradigma Fotografie. Fotokritik am Ende des fotografischen Zeitalters. Band I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Malinowski, B., 1923. The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. In: C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards, eds. The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul LTD, pp. 296–336.

McLuhan, M., 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Critical E. T. Gordon W., ed., 2003. Berkeley: Gingko Press.

Miller, D., 2010. Stuff. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.

Moores, S., 2012. Media, Place and Mobility. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Morley, D., 2007. Media , Modernity and Technology. The Geography of the New. London and New York: Routledge.

Pink, S., 2011. Amateur Photographic Practice, Collective Representation and the Constitution of Place. Visual Studies, 26(2), pp. 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586x.2011.571884

Ponzanesi, S. & Leurs, K., 2014. On Digital Crossings in Europe. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 5(1), pp. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc.5.1.3_1

Prieto-Blanco, P. 2016. (Digital) Photography, Experience and Space in Transnational Families. In: E. Gomez-Cruz & A. Lehmuskallio, eds. Digital Photography and Everyday Life. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315696768-9

Rivière, C., 2005. Mobile Camera Phones: A New Form of “Being Together” in Daily Interpersonal Communication. In: R. Ling & P. E. Pedersen, eds. Mobile Communications. Re-negotiation of the Social Sphere. London: Springer, pp. 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-248-9_11

Rose, G., 2003. Family Photographs and Domestic Spacings: A Case Study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(1), pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00074

Shome, R., 2011. “Global Motherhood”: The Transnational Intimacies of White Femininity. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28(January 2015), pp. 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2011.589861

Ulrich, W., 1997. Digitaler Nominalismus. Zum Status der Computerfotografie [Digital Nominalismus. About the Status of Computer Photography]. Fotogeschichte. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Ästhetik der Fotografie [Photo-faces. Contributions to History and Aesthetic of Photography], 64, pp. 63–73.

Villi, M., 2010. Visual Mobile Communication. Camera Phone Photo Messages as Ritual Communication and Mediated Presence, Helsinki: Aalto University.

Wyss, B., 2000. Das indexikalishe Bild. Hors-texte [The indexical image. Horstexts]. Fotogeschichte. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Ästhetik der Fotografie [Photo-faces. Contributions to History and Aesthetic of Photography], 76(3-11).

Zhang, M., 2013. Kodak to Sell Its Camera Film and Imaging Businesses in $2.8 Billion Deal. PetaPixel [online]. <https://petapixel.com/2013/04/29/kodak-to-sell-its-camera-film-and-imaging-businesses-in-2-8-billion-deal/> [Accessed 3 Aug. 2015].

© Membrana Institute and the author(s). All rights reserved.