The Master

CFP 2020

Membrana vol 5, no. 2 (2020) – Call for papers & projects: The Master – Deadline for proposals – July 27, 2020. Deadline extended to August 10, 2020!

Membrana vol 5, no. 2 (The Master) investigates the dynamics of visual domination, visual presence, familiarity and iconicity of images in relation to the figure of the master.

Even before the invention of the camera, the master has always been entwined with its image – in coinage, sculptures, paintings, drawings, and other media – but it seems that photography has both continued and complicated the master-image relation.

As before, a master can stage portraits and public performances to secure domination through a public circulation of its image(s). But photography’s “contribution” to the master-image relation was not merely to enhance the intertwinement of the master with its image. At least since the beginning of the 20th century, it has become apparent that photography can simultaneously capture something else – the unexpected, the unwitting, the excess that eludes control. Moreover, the mass proliferation of image-making in the early 21st century and the changed information and communication ecosystems have made the control of one’s public image a precarious process, dictated to a large extent by an image-generating social apparatus and algorithmic logic.

To a large extent, the age-old dialectic between the master and the servant seems to be flipped on its head – the master being evermore the servant of its own representation, of its most shareable common public visual denominator, be it likable, hated or reviled. Is the master becoming ever more the servant of its own representation? Is this representation being hollowed-out, becoming “merely” an abstract visualisation of power, detached from any of the master’s traits? Have we entered a new era of a master figure without any grandeur or charisma, a master lacking any sign of dignity – a master for which the denomination only holds true in terms of political power, lacking any “grand” visual signs of the historical personas of the past?

What role do photographs play in the creation, strengthening, or subversion of (the images of) the master? Do photographs (un)wittingly legitimize the power, or do they recast power within the wider social network of signs? What is their role in the subject’s compliance with the authority, acceding to the rules of the master? Is domination via visual signs nowadays a necessary condition for social dominance or it is just a side spectacle?

We invite textual and visual contributions that explore the master, domination, and subjugation in the relation to photographs, from contemporary and historical viewpoints, and through (but not limited to) the following perspectives: 

– authoritarian figures and photography
– authority, subjugation, domination through photography
– master-slave dialectics and the image
– the master, white supremacy, right-wing nationalism and photography
– the master and author (genius as the master)
– photographer as a master
– power, charisma and figures of the master
– fine-art photography and subversion of figures of the master
– visual propaganda
– social media and figures of the master
– image aesthetics and figures of the master
– photographic presence as it stabilizes or destabilizes domination
– celebrity and banality in constructions of power
– hierarchy, networks, and mastery
– masters made or undone by photography, post-truth and the master
– icons and iconicity in constructions and deconstructions of authority
– the master in relation to photography’s civil contract or democratic promise
– the master and conditions of excess, abundance, or utopian potential
– the master and the optical unconscious
– the master and public spectatorship
– the master in an ecology of images
– master-slave dichotomy, computational technologies and photography
– attracting the master’s attention: photography’s stance in contemporary art practice

Format of contributions


  • Essays, theoretical papers, overview articles, interviews (approx. 15,000–35,000 characters / 2,200–5,000 words), visuals encouraged.
  • Short essays, columns (8,000–21,000 characters / 1,200–3,000 words), visuals encouraged.
  • Photographic projects and artwork: proposals for non-commissioned work or samples of work.

More information about the contributions can be found here. Contributions will be published in the English edition – magazine Membrana (ISSN 2463-8501. eISSN: 2712-4894) and/or in the Slovenian edition – magazine Fotografija (ISSN 1408-3566).

Proposals and deadlines


The deadline for contribution proposals (150-word abstracts and/or visuals) is July 27, 2020 (extended to August 10!). The deadline for the finished contributions from accepted proposals is September 21, 2020 (extended to October 5, 2020!) Please send proposals via the online form or contact us directly at editors(at)membrana.org.

About Membrana / Fotografija


Membrana is a contemporary photography journal dedicated to promoting a profound and theoretically grounded understanding of photography. Its aim is to encourage new, bold, and alternative conceptions of photography theory as well as new and bold approaches to photography in general. Positioning itself in the space between scholarly journal and popular publications, it offers an open forum for critical reflection on the medium, presenting both analytical texts and quality visuals. The journal is published biannually in summer and inwinter in English and in Slovenian (under the title Fotografija) by the Ljubljana-based non-profit institute Membrana.

CFP Master in PDF (English)
CFP Master in PDF (Slovenian)

What role do photographs play in the creation, strengthening, or subversion of (the images of) the master? Do the photographs (un)wittingly legitimize the power, or do they recast power within the wider social network of signs?
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Selfies and the World Behind Our Back
Each innovation in visual media changes the way the world behind our back was seen.
When the Landscape of the Face is Hidden from Us
There was a long table, starched purple vestment and after a few hours of testimony, the Archbishop, chair of the commission, laid down his head, and wept. That’s how it began. – Ingrid de Kok
Normalising Deviance
THE MARKET became about exploring the predatory impact of the market through ‘thick’ cultural description of the nature of its functioning through critical representation of both labour and the environment which so decisively shape our future, but at the same time remain so thoroughly unseen.
Alvaro Deprit
The book is about periods of waiting and suspension – suspension of a journey, of possibilities of a better life, and, many times, of hope.

learn more about the cookies

Our site uses cookies to improve our services. As an user you need to agree to the usage and accept our conditions. We are currently using only necessary cookies for normal web page functioning. For more information visit our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. For more information on the cookies that we use please check the list below.  

Cookies that we use

PHPSESSID
This cookie is native to PHP applications. The cookie is used to store and identify a users’ unique session ID for the purpose of managing user session on the website. The cookie is a session cookies and is deleted when all the browser windows are closed.

sign up

and get the latest news and calls for papers & projects