The Incompleteness of Lookings
PDF

Keywords

augmented reality
gaze
Lacan
looking

How to Cite

Hillman, John. 2018. “The Incompleteness of Lookings”. Membrana – Journal of Photography, Theory and Visual Culture 3 (1):66–69. https://doi.org/10.47659/m4.066.art.

Abstract

Augmented reality is fundamentally different from virtual reality: it does not map a real world environment into a digital one as a virtual experience. Instead, it locates both reality and virtual within the same experiential frame. Through it, our interactions with reality are mediated via the fantasy of an augmented experience. Thus, augmented reality supplements what we see with the purpose of trying to maintain our attention. What is most fascinating about augmented reality is how reality itself becomes a part of, rather than distinct from, digital information. It is in this sense that the very notion of seeing is fundamentally challenged. Since when augmented technology is not deployed, what is left is an apparent incompleteness of simply looking. But what are the consequences of confronting this incompleteness? In this article I examine how augmented reality simply renders a structure that has always sustained the visual field.

https://doi.org/10.47659/m4.066.art
PDF

References

Burgin, V., 2018. The Camera, Essence and Apparatus. London: Mack Books.

Copjec, J., 1994. Read My Desire. London: MIT Press.

Lacan, J., 2004 [1973]. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.

McGowan, T. & Kunkle, S. eds., 2004. Lacan and Contemporary Film. New York: Other Press.

Richter, G., 2009. Gerhard Richter: Text, Writings, Interviews and Letters, 1961–2007. London: Thames & Hudson.

Uricchio, W., 2011. The Algorithmic Turn: Photosynth, Augmented Reality and the Changing Implications of the Image. Visual Studies, 26(1), pp. 25–35.

Žižek, S., 2017. Incontinence of the Void. London: MIT Press.

© Membrana Institute and the author(s). All rights reserved.